The Semitic Controversy

As a Semite, I am interested in the future of anti-Semitism. Therefore I was delighted to read an article dealing with that very theme from the blog Semitic Controversies. The author writes:
The anti-Semitic movement today is at a crossroads in time, it can decide to go three different ways with its critique of jews: it can carry straight on as it has done till the present time using the same style of arguments as it did at the height of its power, it can turn to the left towards simple anti-Zionism or it can turn to the right to create a new critique of jews.

You will notice that the word Jews, despite being a proper noun, is not capitalized. The faux-intellectual tone of the article is negated by this simple act of spite. Must good grammar be sacrificed at the altar of demonology?

I was impressed by this portion of the article, however:
Anti-Semitism has continued using these same arguments and methods to the present day, but had our anti-Semitic forefathers done this then they would still be using the Christian anti-Semitic conception and would be denying that race was a factor in the jewish question. We must in our opposition to the Semitic peoples look for a new way and update our thought accordingly.

Finally, an open anti-Semitism that truly embraces the meaning of the word! Jews are simply the vanguard of the historical Babylonian-Sumerian-Assyrian-Aramean crusade against the white race.

A telling indication of the anti-Semitic mindset is found in the following sentence, with my emphasis added:
Since now anti-Semitism is anti-Zionism, it does not recognise the jew as a jew, but merely as an individual who is either Zionist or anti-Zionist.

Merely as an individual! Only non-Jews have the right to be individuals.

"Semitism" begins with the story of Adam and Eve. We all descend from the sons of Noah: Shem (Semites), Japheth (Indo-Europeans) or Ham (Africans), but Noah descends from Adam. God judged that man be divided into tribes and languages after the fall of Babel, but we must also be cognizant of our common origin.

In Semitic cosmology, there is a divinely-mandated place for all peoples. In anti-Semitic cosmology, there is a Darwin-mandated place for all peoples except the Semites. In Semitic cosmology, the individual is holy because he was made in the image of God. In anti-Semitic cosmology, the individual is instrumental and interchangeable because he was made in the image of his race.

The battle between Semitism and anti-Semitism is one of theology (man is holy) versus zoology (man is an animal), national pluralism (every nation has its mandate) versus national socialism (every nation is in a war of survival with every other), freedom of choice (anyone can convert to a Semitic religion) versus slavery to heredity (only those born Aryan can be Aryan), metaphysical monism (God is one) versus metaphysical dualism (the Aryan is Good, the Semite is Evil). I choose Semitism.

Comments

  1. Rocky2July 14, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    DAVID LETTERMAN'S HATE, ETC. !

    David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
    Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
    Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"
    Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!
    While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
    (For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State," "Michael the Narc-Angel," and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")

    ReplyDelete
  2. ¡Benjaminista!August 16, 2009 at 7:26 AM

    . . . David Letterman is not Jewish.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manifesto

The establishment of the state of Israel is the most profound modification of the galut which has occurred, but it is not the end of the galut : in the religious sense, and perhaps not only in the religious sense, the state of Israel is a part of the galut . Finite, relative problems can be solved; infinite, absolute problems cannot be solved. In other words, human beings will never create a society which is free of contradictions. From every point of view it looks as if the Jewish people were the chosen people, at least in the sense that the Jewish problem is the most manifest symbol of the human problem . . . - Leo Strauss I am a Jew living in the galut . I would remain a Jew living in the galut if I lived on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Zionism responds to the geopolitical dimension of Jewish exile, but exile is not simply or primarily a geopolitical problem. Exile is an infinite, absolute problem that crosses all borders. The state of exile encompasses displacement from God, di
Read more

The Anti-Semite as High School Girl

The Germans hate the Jewish religion less than their race, less their peculiar faith than their peculiar noses. - Moses Hess, Rome and Jerusalem The most assimilated and preeminent Westerners of Jewish lineage still preserved in their physical physiognomy, if in nothing else, the unmistakable and eternal stamp of Israel. And this inevitable fact has again and again infuriated the pagan peoples of the world. - Ludwig Lewisohn I found the reductio ad absurdum proof of the above sentiment in a blog comment posted by an Internet beauty queen: Plenty of people object to Jewish looks/appearance, not just WNs…Jews tend to be very physically ugly. Actually, the vast majority of Jews aren’t just ugly, many are FRIGHTENINGLY UGLY, so much so that most normal and healthy people of all racial/ethnic backgrounds are immediately repulsed or even instinctively scared (women and children, mostly) of them and as such avoid contact with them. Full-blooded Jews, especially unmixed Ashkenazim, are quite
Read more

Anti-Semites, The Nation of Priests

Anti-Semites cite the following passage from Genealogy of Morals to enlist Nietzsche into their cause: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews—the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are
Read more